A Musing: Vibrant Matter


Some books change your mind. But other books confirm strange things that you deeply believed all along. Vibrant Matter by Jane Bennett is one of those books. You mean, a philosopher and political theorist senses what this silly woman with an overactive imagination senses, too? That things both human and nonhuman have agency? Thing Power?

Thing power gestures toward the strange ability of ordinary, man-made items to exceed their status of objects and to manifest traces of independence or aliveness, constituting the outside of our own experience (xvi)

Vibrant Matter is a beautifully and poetically conceived and written metaphysical meditation on thing power. Vibrant Materiality. Nonhuman agency. From landfills which generate an “alive” mix of chemicals, the electrical power grid which flows in ways unplanned and unintended by humans, and the Great Pacific garbage patch  (does the Great Pacific garbage patch give you nightmares, too?). She talks about Dewey, and Nietzsche, and Thoreau, omega-3 fatty acids, worms, and metal. And us. Humans are there, too, just not as the center of everything.

Bennett notes that one way to become aware of vibrancy of matter is by seeing where people anthropomorphize objects. I understood this concept best not from her book, but from a lecture she gave at The New School (long but completely amazing). She works with the concept of hoarding and hoarders, and experimentally sees the phenomenon not as a pathology, but rather as the hoarder being a person especially sensitive to the agency of matter. Hoarders say things like “but all of those books need me!” or “Who else will take care of these boxes.” The notion of anthropomorphizing objects is not only important because it expresses the vibrancy of matter, but because it “works against anthropocentrism,” the belief that humans are the most significant entity in the universe (120). I was able to find this in my research thus far with the objects of Rose Valley, and don’t you think many authors are very sensitive vibrant materialists too? Dickens comes to mind immediately.

A shift from environmentalism to vibrant materialism is pondered. Instead of using less, perhaps we need to acknowledge (embrace, cultivate a careful attentiveness to) the complexity of all? Although I originally read this book as an “in” to New Materialism for my Rose Valley project, I realized it was the more abstract sister of the New Materialism happening in “maker” circles (for which I’m a huge proponent and participant).

Bennett ends her book with a New Materialist manifesto of sorts, which sends chills down my spine. I love it. I believe it. I try to live it each day:

I believe in one-matter energy, the maker of things seen and unseen. I believe that this pluriverse is traversed by heterogeneities that are continually doing things. I believe it is wrong to deny vitality to nonhuman beings, forces, and forms, and that  careful course of anthropomorphization can help reveal that vitality, even though it resists full translation and exceeds my comprehensive grasp. I believe that encounters with lively matter can chasten my fantasies of human mastery, highlight the common materiality of all that is, expose a wider distribution of agency, and reshape the self and its interests. (122)

Amen 🙂

Also, how cool is it that when I requested this book via interlibrary loan, the copy that Jane Bennett gave to her alma mater arrived for me?!


Vibrant Matter INDEED!

nota bene: The moment I get my tuition reimbursement for this semester I’m purchasing this book. I can’t stand to live without it. If you are interested in such things, I most highly recommend it. I need to read it at least 10 more times posthaste!

image: from Friends of the Pleistocene.


  1. kaggsysbookishramblings

    As someone who worries about abandoned books, bringing far too many home; who has anthropomorphised our 26 year old car so much that I shall be a wreck when we finally lose it; and who talks to soft toys on a regular basis – well, this sounds like a book for me!

  2. Pingback: Vibrant Matter Skirt | Life During Wartime Challenge
  3. chezjulie

    Jackie, I attended a conference presentation last month on “object-oriented rhetoric” and the technology of Downton Abbey. I think you would have found it very interesting! Here’s the abstract:

    “This presentation explores how Downton Abbey removes viewers from our immediate technodomesticity, thus allowing observation of the developing rhetoric of (modern) technology through an object oriented discourse, and argues that the series provides critical commentary on our contemporary relationships with technological objects. Using Graham Harman’s concept of black noise, this presentation wrestles with Downton Abbey’s exposure of the rapid, early evolution of our technological devices from objects with “chaotic qualities demanding to be shaped by the human mind” to the “muffled objects hovering at the fringes of our attention” (Guerrilla Metaphysics 183).”

    I also agree about DIckens and materiality. I wrote a paper for a graduate level course on Clutter in Bleak House. (The paper-writing itself was excruciating and I had to take an Incomplete to finish it, but I was fascinated with all the places full of stuff in the novel).

    • jackiemania

      Fascinating, both the Downton work and your paper! I haven’t heard of the book Guerrilla Metaphysics (although I do think I’ve heard the name Graham Harman batted around). Must check this book out! Thank you!!! What conference was this? Sounds like something to keep on my radar!

  4. Pingback: This Thing of Paper | Verum Factum

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s